Thursday, May 15, 2014

What’s In A Name?

            As one might expect, the self-titled novella, Pudd’nhead Wilson, suggests that that man himself is an idiot but important, as he would be the protagonist. On the contrary, when Wilson is first described, we are introduced to a “…homely…young fellow, with an intelligent blue eye that had frankness and comradeship in it and a covert twinkle of a pleasant sort,” (58-59). One might presume this could actually be a promising young man with every hope of becoming a competent and respectable citizen of Dawson’s Landing. But just as quickly as he gains favor among his new gentlemanly acquaintances, he loses his credibility just as fast by the power of one single “fatal remark” that he makes, which brands him with the undignified nickname “Pudd’nhead Wilson.” In the text, Twain emphasizes their deadpan and self-righteous reaction to his “fatal remark” with one of the spectator’s line, “perfect jackass – yes, and it ain’t going too far to say he is a puddn’head. If he ain’t a pudd’nhead, I ain’t no judge, that’s all,” (60).
Despite Wilson’s now tainted reputation, Twain’s genius lies in the subtle implication that these proper gentlemen have every capability to understand the true essence of Wilson’s “fatal remark” and still take it literally. Ironically, they entirely miss the humor and savvy of this young man’s comment and because of it, are responsible for ruining his future with them – demonstrating that they might not be as sharp as they assert themselves to be. Twain reaffirms this hint of Wilson’s intellectual wit throughout the entire story using the eccentric, calendar quotes that often foreshadow the events of each chapter. Even before introducing Wilson at all – Twain opens the book using the quote:

There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed by ridicule, howsoever poor and witless. Observe the ass, for instance: his character is about perfect, he is the choicest spirit among all the humbler animals, yet see what ridicule has brought him to. Instead of feeling complimented when we are called an ass, we are left in doubt. (55)

This suggests that the no matter who you are – you are subject to the pitfalls of slander and public opinion, which is precisely what Wilson experiences yet seemingly demonstrates great humility nonetheless - “…with Scotch patience and pluck he resolved to lived down his reputation and work his way into the legal field yet. Poor fellow, he could not foresee that it was going to take him such a weary long time to do it,” (61).
            Thus, this leaves us to question that if we are all vulnerable to the repercussions of ridicule, what makes Pudd’nhead stand apart? Would we have felt the same respect and empathy for him if he hadn’t been deemed Pudd’nhead? Would his court case achievement have carried the same satirical message if he hadn’t been known as ‘Pudd’nhead’ all along?  

Works Cited
Twain, Mark. Pudd'nhead Wilson ; And, Those Extraordinary Twins. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986. Print.

3 comments:

  1. Sam- I enjoyed reading your post! I like how you utilized quotes from Pudd'nhead's Calendar as they are an important and sometimes disregarded part of the story. I also like how you pointed out how the reader may of thought of Wilson so much differently in the beginning of the story had he not been named Pudd'nhead from the start. Reading these passages, I felt Twain was trying to emphasize the importance of reputation and the fact that even a small rumor could change a person's outward perception of you for most of your life. In many of his stories Twain seems to point out the delicate nature of "maintaining a good name" and how what people might outwardly perceive about you, does not always accurately portray who you really are. What do you think about how this idea is portrayed in Twain's other stories? How does the idea of Puddn'head's initial reputation relate to the discussion we have been having on identity? Just a few things to think about!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sam- I too enjoyed this post. I thought you did a good job working up to your own thoughts on the matter. I also think it's interesting because this is just as much of an issue today as it was then. It's very natural for us to believe what we hear about someone, regardless of whether or not it is true. Do you think this is something that can be changed in the future, or will we always struggle with prejudices based around names?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting, Samantha. Consider that if it weren't for the judgment and gossip of others, the "ass" would be redeemed. In other words, Pudd'nhead is suggesting that it doesn't matter "who we are"; it matters only what others think of us, others' judgments of us. This can work to one's advantage ("Million Pound Bank Note"), or disadvantage ("Hadleyburg"). Does Pudd'nhead Wilson (the book) reaffirm or refute this cynicism about others' judgments?

    ReplyDelete